The BSD license is a simple license that merely requires that all code retain the BSD license notice if redistributed in source code format, or reproduce the notice if redistributed in binary format.
The modified BSD license (in wide use today) is very similar to the license originally used for the BSD version of Unix. The original version has since been revised, and its descendants are referred to as modified BSD licenses.īSD is both a license and a class of license (generally referred to as BSD-like).
NCPLOT PATH VS SOFTWARE
The original BSD license was used for its namesake, the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD), a Unix-like operating system. This is in contrast to copyleft licenses, which have share-alike requirements.
NCPLOT PATH VS FREE
"BSD licenses are a family of permissive free software licenses, imposing minimal restrictions on the use and distribution of covered software. Most of the companies I deal with prefer a more "permissive free" license as opposed to the GNU thing. Yea the halo thing is a bit much - but so is he. the second time I did, he stated, "If you use that term one more time I'll never speak to you again. I mentioned the term "open source" to him. I had the opportunity to deal with various "open source" projects - but mainly OpenBSD since it's used by a lot of security conscious products (single thread).īut one person I came across - when doing the hardware crypto stuff and the ports from BSD to Linux - was Richard Stallman - the founder of the GNU license thing Tho, when I was working with ex-NSA guys and some of the best computer hackers here in D.C. Wish I could use it.Īnything that sticks it to the man (ie - big commercial companies) I'm all for. So no, I really don't care so much - I still have V Mill and CAMBam but as I stated, FC Path looks really cool. And I hope that any other future user of FC that has the same issue will be helped with what I found.
In the case of my original problem of not being able to produce usable GCode - I had to figure it out myself. I understand that you're all volunteers - I'm on at least 15 forums of various things - From EDA to CAM to CAD to music production - and try to help anyone I can. It would trash the ability of me running the hundreds of Gcode files I already have that use abs arc mode. Why don't you just set it to incremental mode? Whats the problem? Kind of a showstopper of using Freecad for me - shame too, cause it looks pretty cool. So I really can't set up my machine and all my other CAM tools, as well as my machines to incr arcs without causing the hundreds of G Code files I have not being able to be run without major pain. I have two more programs that also allow setting between abs or incr arc mode. py post file.Īnd using a preamble of G91.1 won't work 'cause the posted code is still in incr arc format. There needs to be a way to select absolute arc's - either a simple - type argument or a variable in the. I have four other CAM programs that all use absolute arcs, 3 backplot programs that all use absolute arc's, and hundreds of Gcode files that all use absolute arcs See vid here of what ncplot shows incr arc vs absolute: Having the wrong arc setting shows what's in that topic. My Mach 3 has been set this way for years - 15 to be exact. As i understand gcode arcs, the center is either stated as an offset from the endpoints or calculated by the control from the R word. I'm not even sure I understand what format you're referring to. Can you explain more about the need for this?